Saturday, 27 September 2014

Yoga Is Neuroscience

Yoga is gaining popularity in the scientific literature as a complementary and alternative therapy for a variety of physical and mental health problems. There are studies on the benefits of yoga for chronic back pain, cancer side-effects, mental health disorders and stress-related symptoms (fatigue, insomnia, musculoskeletal pain, etc.), to name a few. Outside of hospitals or clinical studies, yoga studios are packed with people practicing yoga on a regular basis and others who give this discipline a try in the hopes of getting some positive health results.

Yoga is said to be a mind-body discipline, and to me this becomes particularly clear if we understand how the nervous system is organized. In many ways, the body is connected to the mind through the brain, which is part of our nervous system. The brain, together with the spinal cord, forms the Central Nervous System and consistent with it’s name runs along the centre of the body. On the other hand, there is the Peripheral Nervous System, which consists of the nerves that branch off of the spinal cord into the most remote places in our body, in other words, into the periphery. These nerves allow us to receive information from inside and outside the body, move our body voluntarily, control body functions (such as organs and glands), and allow us to sense internally and externally. Much of these actions within the peripheral nervous system is directed by the brain and connected through the spinal cord connections. Essentially, everything that we experience (including thoughts and emotions) and perceive is possible thanks to the connection among our mind, body, and brain. Our thoughts, emotions and behaviors are possible thanks to the biological bases of our mind: the brain. Our brain allows us to communicate with other brains and to form relationships and, for some of us, it can also make us feel more connected to nature, the universe or other ways of describing spirituality.
I have been particularly interested lately in learning more about why people practice yoga and the benefits they experience from their own practice. Is this just a fad? Or are there some real perceived health (either mental or physical) benefits? When reading the scientific literature, I learned there are only a few recent articles in which yoga has been studied in healthy people (i.e., not people diagnoses with some illness, condition, or disease). Two studies published in 2013 were of particular interest: They aimed at understanding why people start or return to yoga classes and how yoga influences their perception of health. 

The first study, a survey of yoga practitioners, published in the journal Complementary Therapies in Medicine, showed yoga improved several important aspects of well-being including: happiness (86.5%), energy (84.5%), social relationships (67%), sleep (68.5%), and weight (57.3%). Researchers also found that the more the people practiced yoga, the more they believed yoga improved their health. The second study was published in Global Advances in Health and Medicine, and this time, the survey was done before and after participants took a 4-week beginners yoga program. Before the 4-week yoga program started, most of the people in the study viewed yoga primarily as an exercise activity (92%), or as a spiritual practice (73%), while some others thought of it  as a way to manage health conditions (50%). After the 4-week yoga program, the majority of participants said they now practiced yoga to improve general wellness (81%), as a physical exercise (80%), and for stress management (73%). It’s interesting to learn that people begin to experience benefits of wellness and stress management within only 4 weeks! 

I have also done my own casual survey among friends who practice yoga, asking them why they practice yoga. Some of their responses are grouped in the table below. Along with their responses, I have included some information on how those experiences relate to functions performed by different parts of the nervous system in order to highlight the mind-body-brain connection present in yoga. For example, when someone reports practicing yoga to get into shape or for stretching, they are referring to the physical practice of yoga, which happens thanks to the a division of the peripheral nervous system know as the  voluntary nervous system. The voluntary nervous system allow us to do what it says: move our body freely,  voluntarily. People who say yoga makes them feel relaxed, stress-relieved, or even more energetic, are experiencing functions of their autonomic nervous system, another division of the peripheral nervous system, which regulates the stress response.  Those who report feeling happier (like in the first study), better at controlling their mood, or even more spiritually connected, are experiencing various functions of their brain (i.e., part of their central nervous system). 

To summarize all this information, and most important, make you think about the benefits you are already experiencing from yoga, please refer to the table below. Or, for those who have not yet experienced the benefits of yoga you might consider the realm of possibilities that activate your mind, body, and brain!  The table below groups some of the most commonly reported yoga benefits according to how the nervous system is classified.

To make all this more relevant to your own mind-brain-body, I encourage you to write down what you experience after a yoga class, whether it’s your first one or you’re a regular practitioner, and then try to classify each experience using this table. In this example, we have someone who is practicing yoga for its physical (i.e., musculoskeletal) benefits (flexibility, body alignment, etc.), as well as to feel calmer and relieve stress, but also experiences happiness and manages mood swings better. 

We experience feelings of happiness and general wellness thanks to our brains, and yoga has the potential to improve these positive experiences. By practicing yoga we strive for optimum health for our body, mind, and brain, and for our entire nervous system. All the benefits people report from taking yoga are manifestations of their nervous system. So, I encourage you to consider how yoga is a practice in understand your own nervous system and a way for you to know your brain!


Anxiety, Nutrition, and the Brain

by Vanessa Chiarello, UofT Undergraduate Student in Neuroscience and Blogger for CAN

One minute you feel fine; the next, you are in a frantic frenzy. Just like the calm before a storm, you seem ok but then lightning strikes, creating havoc in the emotion-linked neural pathways of your brain.  

This is panic. This is fear. 

This is anxiety: a sudden physiological response, or a sensation, of extreme fear or worry, that is felt within your body and that consumes every inch of your mind.
To explain anxiety further, let’s start with an example: It’s the first day of the semester. Walking into your calculus class, you think to yourself “Sure, I never learned calculus before and high school math was over two years ago, but I got this. It’s going to be ok.” You sit down with this optimistic mindset. You open your notebook, take out your pen, ready to begin your notes. As you patiently await the arrival of your professor, you reassure yourself that this will be fine, and to pass the time, you start to tune into the conversations of people around you. Oops, maybe that was a bad idea. They’re talking about how they failed this course, not only once, but twice. “Oh,” you say. Somehow though, you manage to shake off that fear before it grows into something big.

“IT WILL BE OK.” Four simple words that you mentally repeat to yourself over and over again as the professor walks in. Immediately, he starts to go over the course syllabus, a typical first-day routine. But there’s an addition: he warns you that this class is fast-paced because it’s a summer course. He warns you that if you don’t do your homework or if you haven’t taken calculus before (like me), this class can quickly become your worst nightmare. He warns you that you may fail this course. Going through page by page of the outline, you suddenly feel overwhelmed. You see chapter titles that sound confusing just on their own and homework questions that seem to go on forever, and now your heart is racing. It skips a beat. Two beats. It’s fluttering. Actually, it feels like its dancing the quick-step. Thoughts of worry and regret flow through your mind at what seems like 100 miles per hour, and you cannot control them. You feel your face grow red and flushed. Has the temperature turned up? Your pen drops because you’re slightly shaking. You feel nauseas, and you can’t breathe. What’s happening to you? Unfortunately, you are experiencing an "anxiety attack."
This was me about two months ago. In what seemed like a fraction of a second, I went from cool, confident, and collected about my calculus class, to a bewildered, can’t-breathe, going to be sick “hot” mess, so to speak. This sensation, called anxiety, was my body’s physiological response to my surrounding external environment—or in other words, my reaction to my calculus professor. Not a pretty good first day, was it? So what did I do? Besides panicking, I did my research, and fortunately I found that nutrition may be a simple and effective way to help. Phew!  

LOWERING ANXIETY NATURALLY: HOW NUTRITION HELPS
Although some of us (the unlucky ones) may be more susceptible to one too many anxiety attacks, there is a way to build up our strength against them: nutrition! How can food be our antidote to anxiety? Well, a number of brain chemicals are out of balance during an anxiety attack, so the solution is to find nutrients that break down into these very important chemicals that we’re in dire need of. Serotonin is one of the major brain-calming chemicals often in deficit in those anxiety-prone people like me. An interesting experiment done on two groups of rats helps explain why serotonin is our saviour: one group had the gene for the transportation of serotonin back into neurons to be used for sending chemical messages, whereas the other group did not have this gene.  Rats of the former group not only have insufficient availability of serotonin but they also have less emotional control and anxiety-like personalities. The same holds true for human subjects. This genotype for abnormal serotonin transporter gene correlates with a hyperactive amygdala, an area of the brain known for its role in processing fear and other emotions. This abnormality seems to lead to lower stress resilience (i.e., inability to cope or “bounce back” after stress). To further test how a low or high level of 5-HT transportation contributes to anxiety, researches fed the two groups of rats a specific diet of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), B vitamins, and phospholipids (soy lethicin): three nutrients shown to decrease anxiety (especially PUFAs). When rats with low serotonin transporter activity were fed a regular diet not rich in the three key nutrients mentioned above they displayed higher anxiety-related behaviour and could not stop their fear response. However, these effects reversed when rats with the same low serotonin were fed a diet rich in the nutrients. In other words, with the specific diet, rats’ anxiety behaviours were reduced! The diet did nothing to rats that had normal functioning serotonin, however, showing that diet has therapeutic benefits only when animals were genetically compromised. 

B vitamins exhibit most of their benefits by elevating mood (i.e., are sometimes used as anti-depressants), which may also help anxiety by contributing to a “feel good” mood. PUFAs increase some serotonin receptors, which make binding of serotonin more efficient and increases serotonin levels in the brain. This leads to decreased anxiety. Other brain chemicals often deficient in anxiety-prone people are GABA (the brains biggest calming chemical), magnesium (prevents against substance P toxicity), potassium (not enough allows too much sodium to enter channels in the brain causing an “overactive, over electrified, anxious” brain), taurine (enhances GABA effects), estrodial (enhances serotonin receptivity), and progesterone (converts into a compound that activates GABA). On the other hand, excess dopamine and glutamate (the brain’s stimulating neurochemicals), as well as histamine (a chemical that activates dopamine receptors) and caffeine can lead to a more anxious, over stimulated brain. In summary, the problem is easily solved at least from a neurochemical perspective: boost your levels of these calming compounds, and avoid the stimulants!

BRAIN CALMING FOODS
So what do we include in our daily diets to calm our brains? Let’s start with polyunsaturated fatty acids first since they seemed to work well for the rodents in the described experiment. Foods high in polyunsaturated fats include vegetable oils (soy, coconut, corn, safflower, and fish oil), fatty fish (salmon, mackerel, herring, and trout), and some nuts and seeds such as walnuts and sunflower seeds. Another bonus of foods high in PUFAs: they are great for your heart! 

Now let’s move onto serotonin foods. The key fact to remember is that no food source contains serotonin directly. Serotonin is derived from the essential amino acid tryptophan (L-tryptophan). Amino acids can be thought of as the “building blocks” of proteins, and tryptophan is considered “essential” because the body cannot make this compound on its own—it has to be derived from your diet. Tryptophan is a key ingredient in several protein rich foods and is the only direct substance that can convert into serotonin. It does this through a two step process: first tryptophan is converted into a chemical called 5-HTP which then converts into serotonin. So if you want to increase your serotonin, its food high in tryptophan that you need to be on the look-out for. Some of these foods include: tofu and most soy products, black-eyed peas, walnuts, almonds, sesame seeds, roasted pumpkin seeds, complex carbohydrates (whole wheat bread, brown rice, and quinoa), poultry (chicken and turkey), seafood, and low fat dairy. Another bonus of tryptophan is that it helps produce Vitamin B3 (niacin), another vitamin (as the rodent experiment also showed) that helps create a healthy mood. 

This brings us to the B vitamins, which are found in a variety of foods such as dark leafy green vegetables, fortified cereals, almonds and peanuts, asparagus, dairy products, legumes, poultry, bananas, seafood and avocados (just to name a few). Now how about GABA? Some of the foods that naturally help increase levels of GABA in the brain are shrimp, brown rice, hummus, olive oil, cherry tomatoes, and kefir. Did you know that B vitamins and magnesium are needed for GABA to be converted from its precursor? See how everything is all connected! This hopefully shows how one item out of balance can produce a domino effect on the brain. Foods high in magnesium and potassium have all been mentioned above with the additions of dried fruits and dark chocolate (for magnesium) and cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and brussel sprouts, potatoes, squash, and mushrooms (for potassium). As for sugary foods and drinks, processed foods, refined carbohydrates, caffeine, and alcohol—stay away! These foods trigger anxiety (and a depressed mood). So if you want to lower your anxiety (or depression) naturally, it’s time to start eating the right foods that will give you a healthy, calm mind and spirit.

As my very own calculus professor said, "If you come to write your test and you get anxiety, you know when your palms begin to sweat and you get clammy, and now you know nothing? Well, if you do that, then you have no hope." I think what he was trying to say was that anxiety can have a widespread affect, not only interfering with our biochemistry but also with the outcomes of our situations. What is going on internally gets projected externally. Anxiety has consequences, but luckily, it can also be managed. So here is my prescription for you: sit down, have a handful of almonds, or a banana smoothie, maybe add in some spinach and an avocado, and relax. Breathe deeply. You can get through this. 

Understanding the brain mechanisms associated with anxiety are challenging for researchers, never mind the non-scientist. However, some of you may be interested in going a bit deeper. Below is a more comprehensive overview of some of that ways in which neuroscience is informing us about the biology of anxiety.

WHAT EXACTLY IS GOING ON IN MY BRAIN AND HOW CAN NUTRITION HELP?
For starters, the brain mechanisms and chemicals involved in anxiety are not yet fully understood, but enough evidence exists that tells us a lot is going on within the brain. Anxiety, especially anxiety attacks, is complex, and many brain pathways (called neural circuits) and brain chemicals (called neurotransmitters) are affected. Let’s begin with the amygdala, a structure within the brain where emotions, including fear, are processed. It makes sense then that this brain region is hyperactive during a burst of anxiety (or an anxiety attack). The amygdala has reciprocal connections to the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the brain region that regulates thought and that is responsible for focus, concentration, and attention. If the amygdala is overactive, this may alter PFC functioning, which could be why we can’t seem to focus or concentrate when anxiety seizes control over us. Additionally, anxiety involves alterations in the processing of the anterior insula, the area of the brain that gives an emotional context for a specific sensory experience. It could be that an over-active response to fear in this brain area leads to a prolonged, and inappropriate, response of anxiety, or an anxiety attack. As you can probably already see, just as the brain is complex and somewhat confusing, disorders of the brain, such as anxiety, are equally as complex.

Neuroscientists and psychologists propose that a region of the brain called the pariaqueductal grey region (PAG) is also hyperactive during anxiety. This is the area involved with fear response (defense reaction). When the PAG is stimulated, studies show that it leads to an “explosive fear reaction” that resembles a panic attack; but the hyper activation of the brain does not stop here! Studies on rodents demonstrate that the anterior hypothalamic area, the medial preoptic area, and the paraventricular nuclei are hyperactive during anxiety; areas of the brain involved in a chemical stress response system called the HPA axis response that integrates stress. It must seem that the entire brain is hyperactivated during anxiety, but remember that the brain is large and complex (and somewhat of a puzzle). Although several brain regions are described to be hyperactive during an anxiety attack or during some kind of stress, some regions (believe it or not) are hypoactive—they are working a little too slow to be helpful. Some of these underactive brain regions are the cingulate cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). The cingulate cortex controls and manages uncomfortable emotions, such as anxiety, and is linked to the cognitive prefrontal cortex system and the emotional limbic system. If this area is underactive, then that means that whatever is making a person uncomfortable, nervous, fearful or stressed is not being managed very well. This lack of, or insuffient, ability to regulate or control stressful conditions may contribute to the sudden and severe anxious response of an anxiety attack.

THE BRAIN CHEMICALS
How about brain chemicals? Which ones are affected by anxiety? Firstly, anxiety involves an elevated level of corticoptrophin releasing factor (CRF). This brain chemical causes part of the adrenal gland to release stress hormones called gluccocorticoids. These stress hormones include cortisol and noradrenalin (aka norepindephrine). If CRF is high during anxiety, then the brain is telling the body that danger is in the environment. The result is that the body releases an excess of stress hormones and then you feel stressed-out and afraid—your heart starts pumping fast, your breathing increases, your mind is racing, and you feel kind of scared. This is the body’s normal response to fear; however, the body should also enact fear extinguishing mechanisms. This is where the brain chemical glutamate comes in, one of the brains greatest excitatory chemicals. Research has shown that glutamergic receptor antagonists (drugs that block glutamate binding sites in the brain) are effective in treating anxiety because they help facilitate fear extinction by encouraging a calmer brain. Another chemical that helps calm the brain is known by its acronym GABA. If anxiety leads to an increase in glutamate, then the ratio between glutamate (excitatory) and GABA (inhibitory or calming) is imbalanced. Treatment may involve either decreasing glutamate (through glutamate-inhibitor drugs) or by increasing GABA levels (or both). In any case, an anxious brain needs to be calmed down.

Now back to the amygdala. This brain region, as said before, processes fearful information and coordinates the threat response by integrating information from the senses, environment, and past experience. The amgydala initiates behavioural and autonomic nervous responses by sending this information through projections to motor (movement) areas and brain stem nuclei (sensory nerves). In healthy individuals, the amydgalar response is modulated or controlled by top-down processing mechanisms involving the medial (middle) prefrontal cortex region, the hippocampus, and the anterior cingulate cortex. The hippocampus is involved in memory and the anterior cingulate cortex is involved in emotional regulation and decision making. Top-down mechanisms use stored information from past experiences to help make sense of a situation or a sensation; in this case, the brain uses its past knowledge on anxiety and the given situation to help regulate the anxiety, or in other words, to tell the brain to relax and breathe. Research shows that individuals who experience frequent anxiety attacks or who have been diagnosed with one of the many types of anxiety disorders, respond to threat with increased activity in the amgydala. Research also shows that anxiety-prone people have altered insular function. As mentioned above, the anterior insula is a brain region responsible for environment-emotion evaluation. It might just be that more anxious people have more sensitive and reactive amydalas and misbehaving insulas.

Now perhaps the most important are the neurotransmitters involved in anxiety: the monoamines. More specifically, serotonin and norepinephrine are widely recognized for their roles in mood disorders like anxiety. Another brain chemical, neuropeptides, are also believed to play a role in anxiety. This group includes substance P and neuropeptide Y. Substance P increases during anxiety, prolonging the feeling and increasing the stress response, whereas neuropeptide Y modulates mood and reduces anxiety and stress, meaning that there may be a deficiency of it within the brain of those who experience anxiety attacks. Additionally, the hormones oxytocin and orexin are involved. In a rodent-model study (a study done on rats), oxytocin is shown to act on nuclei (parts of brain cells) in the amygdala, inhibiting or blocking excitatory flow from the amygdala to the autonomic nervous system (the branch of the nervous system that mediates fear response). In other words, oxytocin helps reduce anxiety by decreasing amygdalar reaction to something perceived as stressful or fearful. 

Orexin, on the other hand, may be in excess in those prone to anxiety. Orexin is the hormone involved in the “brain reward” pathway, and may lead to excess of the neurotransmitter dopamine—the brain’s greatest stimulating chemical. If dopamine increases, then the brain is on a kind of “high” where everything it perceives is heightened, including fear. This happens because the body naturally converts dopamine to norepinephrine (a major stress hormone) that then converts to adrenaline (major stimulating hormone). Research however, shows that individual differences do exist in neuroendocrine (brain hormone) sensitivity, so different people may experience anxiety because of different abnormalities in their brains. This supports the theory that anxiety attacks have a genetic basis.

This seems like an overwhelming amount of changes that go on in the anxious brain, but there is one more abnormality to explore: the chemical release system, called the HPA axis, which is responsible for the release of the stress hormones during the experience of anxiety. Here is what happens: CRF is released by a brain region called the hypothalamus, which then tells another brain region called the pituitary gland (situated just under the hypothalamus) to release adrenocorticotropin-releasing hormone (ACTH) which tells the adrenal gland to release glucocorticoids—the stress hormones. When an anxiety attack is experienced, however, and the individual is prone to anxiety (maybe because of their genetics), this system is hyperactive, meaning that it is working in overdrive, pumping out too many stress hormones and leading to heightened anxiety. What this system lacks in highly-anxious people are a strong pair of “brakes”. The negative feedback mechanism that tells the brain to work in reverse (lower anxiety and production of stress hormones) is not functioning that well. In result, anxious people have elevated CRF levels and an altered HPA axis: stress hormones are taking over! In normal, non-anxious prone individuals, gluccocorticoids should bind to receptors on the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, telling them to stop releasing any more CRF and ACTH. This is the body`s normal, natural way of lowering anxiety and bringing back a balance.

Obviously, something goes wrong in the brain during an anxiety attack. Given the diversity within the human population in terms of individual genes (called genotypes), what exactly is going wrong in the brains of those who experience anxiety may not always be the same between people. For example, perhaps one person gets anxious because they have insufficient serotonin, which may occur for multiple of reasons (i.e. not enough serotonin receptors, binding insufficiency, or low serotonin levels). But maybe another person has perfectly normal serotonin levels, but has a hyperactive HPA system or a more reactive amygdala. The reasons for an anxiety attack are many, but perhaps the most interesting is their onset. How do anxiety attacks occur? Numerous research studies done on rats have tested anxiety and fear, and most theorize that anxiety attacks arise because of the way an individual’s genes and their environment interact. 

HOW YOUR ENVIRONMENT AND YOUR GENES MAY BE MAKING YOU ANXIOUS
Pathological anxiety, or anxiety that is abnormal and interferes with everyday life, is defined as excessive anxiety that causes significant distress. An anxiety attack can be triggered in a diverse range of conditions, and involves a combination of external (environment) and internal (genetic) factors. These factors increase a person’s vulnerability to an anxiety attack and decrease the efficiency of the brain and body to reduce or prevent excessive bursts of anxiety. There are dysfunctions in neural circuitries:  inadequate “calming” mechanisms and overactive anxiety, or excitatory, mechanisms, making a person respond aversively to emotional challenges and causing prolonged and/or exaggerated stress and fear responses. A person who suffers from anxiety or anxiety attacks express inappropriate anxious behaviour, interpret a situation as threatening when it’s not (or more threatening than it is), and have a lower stress response threshold. But why does this happen?
Through rodent-model studies, scientists learned that fear and anxiety-like behaviours are polygenetically inherited, meaning that many genes contribute to anxiety. This is also true for humans, and is why some people are more vulnerable to stress response and anxiety attacks, while others seem to cope better with emotional challenges.  It may also be the case that those people with anxiety attacks have coping deficits: anxiety from the same stimulus in rodents resulted in longer lasting anxiety-related behaviour in rodents with the genotype for increased susceptibility to anxiety. 

Overall, research suggests that dysfunctions in the processing of anxiety in integrated brain circuits involved with fear, anxiety, and stress (such as the limbic, hypothalamic, and hindbrain areas) may either lead to exaggerated activation of pathways that mediate anxiety or to insufficient regulating mechanisms that suppress anxiety and stress.  The exact dysfunction can vary within individuals, and occurs because of the inheritance of an “anxiety gene” on which the environment acts upon and activates its expression. 

Remarkably, an anxiety attack is therefore more than just an unpleasant sensation: it is the product of many hyper activated brain regions and hypoactive or dysfunctional coping mechanisms, without forgetting the influence and interaction of environment and genetics. What happens in the brain depends slightly on what exactly happens in the environment: different situations evoke different brain circuitries involved in stress, emotion, and memory. Any alterations to these pathways and responses may be induced by a person’s specific genotype that makes him or her more likely to experience an anxiety attack under less aversive conditions than what would cause the average person anxiety. 


So don’t stress out too much. If you experience anxiety attacks like I do, hopefully you can find some peace of mind in knowing that it may not be you, but your genes, environment, or diet (or a combination) that is making you anxious! Inhale calmness, and exhale stress. It’s time to gain control over your anxiety by knowing about your brain. 

The Neuroscience of Social Innovation

By Mandy Wintink, PhD
(A piece written for the Centre for Social Innovation Magazine in the fall of 2013)

As a neuroscientist, I canʼt help but wonder about what might be going on in the brains of my socially-innovating colleagues at CSI. As a result, I have compiled some ideas about what might actually be happening in your brain...

First, letʼs consider the ability to think innovatively. An angle some researchers took to understand it better was to study people during “Aha!” moments of insight. In one study, researchers were able to capture these Aha! moment in people while they were solving riddles. During the Aha! moment, several areas of the brain were activated, mostly within the frontal cortex. The cortex is a sheath of brain cells that essentially compiles and associates information from lower-level brain areas that feed into the cortex. The cortex is divided into several lobes of functional specialization, the frontal cortex being involved in a variety of higher cognitive processes like creativity, rationality, logic, and planning - all aspects of thinking that are required for innovation. Therefore, it is not surprising that the frontal area becomes active at the moment of insight! One of the areas in particular that was activated is called the precuneus. It addition to it being activated during “Aha!” moments, the precuneus is also activated during creative tasks.

To break this down just a bit further, consider two other areas that were also activated during insight: the left inferior frontal gyrus and the middle frontal gyrus (areas named due to their relative location in the brain). These areas get activated when mental sets are broken down. Forming mental sets is our mindʼs way of making things automatic and routine, to reduce unnecessary thinking. But when we are striving for innovation, they do us little good. Instead, we need to rid ourselves of habitual ways of thinking in exchange for creativity and insight.

But we know that innovative thinking is only one aspect of being a social innovator. At CSI, we have a social mission, in which case, we probably need to have some kind of empathy or compassion for the social issue we are seeking to alleviate. In a very eloquent TED talk, Neuroscientist Dr. Ramachandran describes the brainʼs mirror neurons as a possible neural theory of empathy. Mirror neurons seem to do what they are named after: mirror. They reflect back to the person a sense of sameness. For example, when we perform a certain act (like moving our arm) certain neurons are activated but more interesting is that when that same behaviour is reflected back to us, those same neurons respond, giving them the name mirror neurons. These neurons have been consider possible roots for empathy because they seem to represent the neural code for “I feel ya.”

As social innovators we may also value equality more than our non-social-activist counterparts, which means our insular cortex might be activated. In one study, people were part of a game in which random income was allocated to all members. But, members of the game could choose to re-distribute income more fairly, providing they paid a sum of their own income. Those who chose to pay showed greater activation in their insular cortex. Interestingly, the insula has been shown to be activated when experience “disgust”. This makes me wonder if some of us really do become disgusted by the social issue we seek to resolve.

Another key aspect of social innovators inevitably involves change and action. We readily approach opportunities to make ripples (and sometimes waves) with a sense of adventure and fervor. In psychology we call this novelty-seeking behaviour. The key factor here is the response one elicits to novelty. Some people respond poorly to novelty and exhibit high levels of anxiety when faced with it. Others approach novelty, the unknown, and unfamiliar territory eagerly with little anxiety or stress response activated. The neural system that involves this approach-avoidance behaviour includes the hippocampus (also known for its role in memory) and the amygdala (well know for its role in emotion). Both of those are part of a greater emotional system called the limbic system, one that does well when we exercise regularly and keep our general life stressors down!


So there you have it. A few ways you can consider how your brain might work amidst your socially-innovative endeavors. Your brain is one of your must useful and delicate resources with incredible innovative power. I believe that the more we know about our brains, the better we can use them. And therein lies the mission of my company, the Centre for Applied Neuroscience. Visit us our library at www.KnowYourBrain.ca for more brain bits.

How Does Coffee Cure My Depression

by Mandy Wintink

I’m going to admit something here, which I have admitted elsewhere, but do so somewhat reluctantly: I like to feel stimulated. In fact, my entire life is built on the idea of having a passion- and purpose-driven existence, which is a formula for stimulation, at least for me. Similarly, I love the energy of the City of Toronto, the exhilaration of competition, and the tantalizing feeling of a good argument. Anyone who knows me well, knows this about me. 

What I don’t like is feeling depressed, apathetic, and without purpose. In fact, it devastates me to the point where I feel, myself, as somewhat pointless. But often it is an inevitably flip side to the stimulation I seek so often. Here is an example.

This week has been an incredible week. I had an intensely stimulating weekend of intellectual preparation for a full-day interview on Monday for a faculty position in the psychology department at the University of Toronto. The day itself was rather incredible, for the most part. Questions about pedagogy, science, and plans for future experiential-learning teaching - all wonderful topics in my opinion. On Tuesday, I prepped to teach again and then that night I had a dinner with faculty members as part of my interview. Essentially, I was “on” for several days in a row by that point. When I woke up Wednesday morning, it was different. I felt like I was without a clear purpose, largely because I had just devoted a significant amount of my energy to a very specific goal: get through the interview with flying colors. Wednesday, Thursday, and this morning all met me with a variety of depression-like experiences including tiredness, apathy, sense of purposelessness. 

By this morning, “enough was enough” I thought. What can I do about this? The psychopharmacology-interested side of me wanted to experiment, partially in honor of Brain Awareness Week and a series of “self studies” we, at the Centre for Applied Neuroscience just launched. The first one was on “Drugs and Behaviour: How Chemicals Like Alcohol, Nicotine, and Caffeine Make Us Feel”. So, in line with that, I decided to test myself (again). 

Background: I don’t drink coffee regularly (any more). I quit over a year ago. I occasionally have a cup of coffee on the weekends and every once in awhile the barista mixes up my decaffeinated order with a regular coffee - and believe me I can tell! Coffee normally does one of two things to me. It either puts me WAY over the edge, has my entire body buzzing, and makes me sick to my stomach with anxiety. The other thing coffee does to my is gives me a “liquid-high experience”, which involves a state of complete bliss, wonderfulness, and a deep sense that life is absolutely amazing and perfect. I yearn for that experience. It reminds me of moments laying a dock in the sun, a good yoga practice, or the time I took anxiety medication for 5 months. 

Today, I wanted to test the hypothesis that caffeine can cure my depression. So I walked down to a coffee shop and got myself a soya cortado — espresso-based drinks are the BEST for invoking a liquid high, in my experience. I began sipping all the way out the door, down the street back to my place, and as I continue to type right now. And then BOOM, just as expected (~ 45 minutes for peak caffeine to hit the brain), I am hit with my welcomed liquid inspiration. Bye-bye depression! Beautifully orchestrated. 


So why does this happen? Well, scientific evidence suggests that caffeine, although a stimulant, does not appear to work through the dopamine neurotransmitter system, like the other common stimulants, cocaine and amphetamine. Caffeine (and the similar stimulant, Theophylline, which is predominant in tea) appears to work on the adenosine neurotransmitter system. Outside of the brain, adenosine has a role in the basic biochemical energy process as part of the compound ATP (aka adenosine triphosphate). Adenosine is also one of the nucleosides in RNA. But in the brain, it seems to function like a neurotransmitter and plays a role in wakefulness. Adenosine is also responsible for the drowsiness we feel after a period of sleep deprivation. Adenosine has several receptors that it work on, one of which is denoted as A2A. Interestingly, caffeineblocks this specific receptor subtype. More interesting, is that blocking this receptor subtype also shows antidepressant effects in several animal models of depression. 


So… did coffee cure my depression today? Most likely. 

Optogenetics: Turning On Our Brain Like a Light Switch

By Mandy Wintink

Science can baffle even scientists with its incredible technological power. Imagine being able to control your own brain by simply shining a light into it. All of a sudden you might feel particularly sexual or defensive or aggressive or creative or loving. This may not be possible with humans YET but some of that has been demonstrated in laboratory animals using a technique called “optogenetics”, which was the buzz word at dinners, coffee breaks, and lectures that I was at last week at the Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting.  

Optogenetics is a technique that allows researchers to very discretely control activity within single brain cells of living brain tissue. “Opto” actually comes from the Latin opto meaning “choose”. At first I mistakenly thought it referred to “optics”, as in light because of how the technology works. The technology involves inserting a light-sensitive probe into cells that can later be activated or silenced by shinning light on those same cells. The probe serves to inject cells with one of several rhodopsins (genes that code for proteins that direct response to light). You may remembering hearing about “rhodopsin” in our human retina. Same idea although in this context rhodopsin is typically taken from photo-sensitive algae. 

The beauty of this technique, from a purely scientific perspective, is the ease at which we can manipulate the system and its behaviour. One lecture I attended was particularly interesting because the researcher showed an animal that in one moment was naturally moving around its cage and then with the flip of a switch (and shinning of the light) the animal instantly started mounting its cagemate. Then, with another flip of a switch, and light shone onto an adjacent area of the brain not far off (i.e., regions of the hypothalamus), the animal quickly changed from mounting into an aggressive attacker.

I have to admit, watching this on video made me quite sympathetic to the poor other mouse who was privy to these sudden changes in behaviour, first being mounted then being attacked in an unnaturally fast manner. I can only imagine that there is a separate animal model of anxiety developing in the innocent bystander mouse! When I was telling someone else about this study (and how I felt bad for the bystander mouse), the person asked “but don’t you also feel bad for the experimental mouse that’s behaviour was being manipulated?”  In fact, the truth is I was less concerned about the mating-attacking mouse because he likely didn’t know any difference. To him, he was probably simply responding to a very real urge to “mount!” then “attack!” as directed by the brain. But for this mouse, the animal who was enduring these sudden changes in behaviour, it may not be that much different than if the instinct emerged naturally on its own. He may not be any more or less in control than before and rather, simply respond to what his brain tells him to do. Reminds me of a talk I also saw by the lawyer, philosopher, neuroscientist, Nita Farahany (written about here).

But alas, it begs the question that others have asked before (e.g., Daniel Gilbert in his TED talk on Happiness). If you were given the opportunity to optogenetically treat yourself for say, simulate dopamine to reduce symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, would you? Or activate happiness to treat depression, would you? Or erase a traumatic memory to ease PTSD, would you?  There is a line there somewhere that we each have in terms of what we would and would not do. Optogenetics may seem exciting (or scary) but perhaps it is not that much different that the “optoreality” we exist under. We are opting for experiences each day with the foods that we eat (or don’t eat), the behaviours we engage in, the people we hang out with, the climate we live in, the alcohol we drink, cigarettes we do or do not smoke, exercise or mindfulness we do or do not do... Optogenetics may just be a fast-track to health, one faster than pharmaceuticals that doesn’t have to pass through our liver.  Hmmmm.... something to think about, says this Provocateur!

Related TED Talk:

Blaming Our Brains

Imagine being accused of murder and being able to blame your brain? Imagine, perhaps, you committed the crime but don’t totally remember it. You were, of course, in a fit of rage because you came home and found your spouse in bed with another person. In hindsight, of course, you know that it was wrong but at the time, you were blinded by rage and barely even felt conscious while doing it. Perhaps the head injury that you suffered from the car accident a few months before, an incident that left you never feeling the same, contributed to your rage. Perhaps, it wasn’t the car accident but, instead, it was your upbringing, the horrific experiences you endured because of an abusive parent. Perhaps you inherited experiences from your mother or father. Could you blame your brain?

In fact, neuroscience is being used more and more in the legal system, particularly during pre-trial determination of competency, during trials, and during sentencing, according. In fact, neuroscience is making its way into the legal system so furiously that if a defendant does not undergo neuropsychological testing a defense lawyer could be charged with “ineffective council”, a serious claim that is traditionally very difficult to prove.

Using neuroscience in the justice system is increasing in a variety of ways, which were described in a very enlightening, philosophical, and intriguing talk by Nita Farahany last week at the Society for Neuroscience annual meeting in San Diego. Here are a few examples of how it has been used:

The Developing Brain Theory - a claim that is being used as a blanket “truth” for teenagers and young people because the neuroscience is so compelling with respect to behaviours like impulsivity and decision making. I am reminded of the experience in Ontario a few weeks ago where one 19-year-old dies after car-surfing and a 16-year driver is charged with criminal negligence causing bodily harm and dangerous driving causing bodily harm. What was striking to me about that incident is that I remember myself returning home one “fun” evening with a bloody and swollen head and leg because of a similar incident where I too was flung from the back of a car. I didn’t know better. And I assume neither did the Ontario teens. 

Reduced Monoamine Oxidase - Monoamine oxidase (MAO) is an enzyme that breaks down serotonin. A gene that regulates this is known as MAOa and its expression is reduced in some males. When that dysfunctional gene combines with sever childhood maltreatment like abuse, these males are more prone to aggression and are more likely to end up in the criminal justice system defending themselves against crimes they are accused of committing. How much are they to blame versus their genetic predisposition and their horrible upbringing?

Drug & Alcohol Abuse - Although medicalizing drugs and alcohol abuse has been helpful for people in seeking treatment and reducing the stigma associated with it as a  “disease”, medicalizing drug and alcohol abuse has also been used in the justice system as a rational for why people get high and commit crimes associated with such abuse. Some defense lawyers have argued an “unconscious brain” predisposed their clients toward drug- and alcohol-related crimes.

Brain injuries that render a person “never the same” aren’t that far of a stretch either. Remember the classic case of Phineas Gage who was struck with an iron rod that shot right through his brain during a railway explosion? He was never the same: He could no longer manage his crew, could not relate to humans the same way, and could not regulate his emotions. How would he fair in today’s society? Imagine if he came home and found his spouse in bed with someone else? Perhaps he too would have tipped over the line. And if so, would his brain be to blame? It was clear that his brain injury was the culprit in changing a beloved and trusted man into a difficult person to have around. 

What about the increased incidents of concussions in sports, which are of serious concern? What about the increased incidents of suicide, possibly related to such concussions? Are these brains to blame if they do lash out and harm themselves? 

Stress damages the brain, including memory systems and decision making. I just saw a lot about that this year at SfN. Actually, I see a lot about it every year at SfN. The evidence is far from scarce. Are those stressed brains to blame when they lash out and/or have a moment of blind rage? Am I to blame when I snap at someone because of a crazy day? Do we accept apologies when we are at the receiving end? if so, does that mean we accept that circumstances (or the brain) is to blame?

What about Adam Lanza who shot and killed 20 1st graders and 6 adults last December. In October of this year information about his medical and school history was released that reported signs of severe anxiety but no overwhelming evidence for what drove him to massacre that day. Perhaps a brain scan would have been useful. 

The effect of this emerging neuroscience as it relates to legalities is forcing us to think about accountability. I myself have long ranted to anyone who would entertain me about this accountability and our lack of free will. People repeatedly feel uncomfortable with my assertion that we have no free will (this is my opinion btw - I have yet to see any with conclusive evidence for or against that assertion). With good reason we are uncomfortable about this: We want to be in charge of us because if not us, then who? 

But what if the neuroscience is right? What if we are a product of our brains, how they develop, and the experiences that helped shape them? Some of that evidence was written about recently with respect to how experiences not only from our lives but our parents lives can influence us. These are indeed, thing to think about! 

In my mind, there is no debate. I believe we are a product of our experiences and those experiences leave footprints in our DNA and in our brain, altering who we are from that moment on, sometimes in huge ways and some times in subtle ways, but nonetheless we are changes each moment of our existence and we are changing the existence of our offspring. But even if you don’t believe that entirely, what if there is a possibility that there is an ounce of truth to that? If so, then, as Nita suggests, we as a society must consider the ramifications of this, most important of which has to do with our justice system. Our system relies on punishment and paying the price for our crimes. But is punishment the best way to deal with our brains? Would efforts directed toward rehabilitation be better served? Our brains are plastic, we know that. How plastic, we don’t know. But if we shape our brains one way, should we not work towards reshaping them in a way that promotes society integration? What happens to the brains of people who spend years in prison? Does that do anything to help alleviate the problem that anxiety, isolation, abuse, or shame has done in the first place?

THAT is something to think about and I encourage you to do so.


Further Resources:
Epigenetics & Stress

Inheriting Our Experiences From Our Father

Book: The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law by Nita Farahany

Science Paper: MAOa and Aggression

Science Paper: Suicide & Concussions

Inheriting Our Father's Inadequacies

Last night I was out with one of my favorite characters from Dalhousie, and I say “character” because that’s exactly what she is. Rahia is creative, funny, outspoken, and has a great scientific mind. Rahia is also currently a PhD student at Columbia University in New York (http://champagnelab.psych.columbia.edu/rahia.html). 

Over (great) beer at this off-the-beaten-path bar, Downtown Johnny Brown’s, Rahia was telling me about her research on the transmission of experiences from fathers, via epigenetic mechanisms to the offspring (see previous post: http://mandywintink.blogspot.com/2012/11/epigenetics-stress-science-review-part-1.html). That in itself is interesting but what was of particular interest -- both to me that night and to Rahia for the past year as she slaved away in the lab -- was whether or not the mothers could regulate the expression of the fathers experiences in utero such that it would change the fate of the offspring. Indeed, Rahia’s data suggest that moms can!  As Rahia put it, it’s like the mom looks at the dad and say “You sucks” and then compensates for that dad inadequacies!

One example of this is when moms may need to overcompensate is when the dad are food restricted and therefore not as healthy as one would like. When the female mates with the food-restricted male she ends up gaining significantly more weight during pregnancy and nursing the young more after birth, thereby compensating for the nutritional deficits of the dad. There are also corresponding changes in the brains of the mom, such as changes in the hypothalamus, an area of the brain regulating several hormones and their dependent behaviours of feeding and stress. This research is interesting indeed: Moms can compensate for the inadequacies of the dads. Like women didn’t already know that, right!?  ;)

But what if the mom doesn’t know that the father has inadequacies? That was the question Rahia posed wondering if moms would fail to compensate for those inadequacies, for example during in vitro fertilization when mating doesn’t actually happen the same way. Rahia tested this by mating females with an “adequate” male that were castrated (so it would not actually impregnate the female), then knocked the female unconscious and knocked her up with the sperm of another male that was food-restricted (a male that was effectively “inadequate”). Btw, this was all done in laboratory rats!  ;)

Interestingly, astonishingly, and super coolly, the females failed to compensate for the inadequacies of the biological dad! They didn’t gain weight or nurse the young more and the result were offspring that had several memory and attentional problems!

This line of research is incredibly interesting from a scientific perspective and I look forward to hearing about how Rahia’s studies evolve. But this work also fits into a greater field of study where several researchers are investigating these transgenerational epigenetic effects, i.e., the effects of experiences that are encoded (epigenetically) within the genome and passed on to future generations. I have written about these before, with respect to inherited stress and maternal care (see http://mandywintink.blogspot.com/2012/11/epigenetics-stress-science-review-part-1.html) Today, at the Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting, scientist Tracy Bale was speaking about this some transgenerational effects she observed, particularly in male laboratory animals. However, we can see justification for this field of research from some historical events, such as the post-WWII calorie-restricted legislation in Holland that forced people, including pregnant women, to eat no more than 400 - 800 calories only a day. That is ridiculously low for those who don’t know. To compare, look up what a Cafe Mocha has and your jaw will drop. The Holland food-restriction, along with several other times of famines, have been investigated and revealed behavioural effects (like anxiety and chronic disease susceptibility) that can be detected in the grand children of people who endured these times. 

In the lab, this has been investigated again with rats under several different circumstances. For example, exposing a father to repeated social defeat results in altered social behaviour in the offspring (think the McFly family from the Back to the Future series). High fat diets in dads also results in dysregulation of glucose and several metabolic processes related to obesity as well as epigenetic changes in the liver. Chronic stress is another model, one that Bale uses in her laboratory. In the process she and her student have revealed some some interesting findings. For example, when dads are exposed to chronic stress (as adults and during puberty) they produced offspring that developed a maladaptive stress system reflected by a poorly functioning hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The HPA axis is a neural system that regulates the stress response, a response that is need for proper coping strategies. Essentially what Bale and her students have found is that the offspring of males who were chronically stressed themselves, were less equipped to deal with stress. 

Bale’s lab has begun to isolate some of the contributors to this poorly functioning stress system including changes in microRNA, a component of epigenetic changes. They identified 9 microRNAs that were expressed (or upregulated) in the offspring of dads that experienced chronic stress. In a creative set of follow-up experiments, Bale’s lab determined that these microRNA were causing some of the offsprings problems by  simply injecting the microRNA right into a developing zygote of non-stressed dads, effectively simulating an experience of paternal stress. The results were as predicted: similar dysfunctional changes in the stress system rendering the offspring less equipped to deal with stress.

Although much of this review was about the negative effects of transgenerational experiences, in fact there are adaptive circumstances that put the offspring in a better predicament, resulting in a more resilient start. Bale ended her talk by suggesting that whether or not one ends up in a resilient or a risky situation after birth is a matter of coping, i.e., how we respond to changes in the environment. Rahia would likely argue that part of these coping mechanisms begin long before the offspring are born and consist of biological and behavioural strategies used by the mom to compensate. 


Complicated and exciting work indeed! For me, this was interesting largely because of the hypotheses and how the researchers, like Rahia, tested them. But when I take a step back and wonder about what this all means I can’t help but think about that common rationale that floats around for why men are thought to be more promiscuous than women. You know the one that says males are biologically predisposed to spread their seeds where as women are biological predisposed to nurture? All of this data makes me wonder about the truth of that whether laboratory animal or human men. I wonder about those men who chose to invest in the seeds they have planted and who do a really great job at it. I think of many of my friends where the men are stay-at-home fathers. I wonder, what sort of things are the women doing to compensate for these really good men? Perhaps, if those men are offering a great nurturing experience post-natally, and the women can detect this - just like they can detect malnourished, chronically stressed, or socially defeated males - would those moms then go on to divert their resources to something else instead of compensating for the dad’s inadequacies? What if, instead, moms could focus on nurturing high-level behaviours of the offspring. It kind of reminds me of Maslow’s Hierachy of Needs. It also kind of makes me want to be back in the lab studying this stuff myself. But alas... I cannot discriminate against all of the wonderful fields of research out there!